is now part of CreativePro.com!

*** From the Archives ***

This article is from November 24, 2014, and is no longer current.

Adobe Drops DPS Single Edition Support from Creative Cloud

109

 [Editor’s note: This article is in two parts. First, an article by Bob Levine; followed by additional notes by David Blatner.]

Adobe is announcing today that it will be “retiring” the Digital Publishing Suite Single Edition (DPS SE) from the Adobe Creative Cloud on May 1 (2015) and removing it as a purchasable product from Adobe.com even sooner, on December 4, 2014.

However, if you have SE projects already in the pipeline, or you’re a Creative Cloud subscriber (which includes an unlimited number of DPS SE applications), don’t panic yet — you have some breathing room.

Bob’s Commentary

Before I tell you what this means, let’s see what it doesn’t mean. Digital Publishing Suite will continue as a stand-alone publishing service for both Professional and Enterprise account holders. There are no changes right now to those plans that pertain to Single Edition apps. So, if you’re a Pro or Enterprise customer you can stop here.

If you’re a Creative Cloud subscriber, however, the value of your subscription just went down a bit. When May 1 rolls around, you will no longer be able to create or modify any Single Edition app. That said, 5 months should be plenty of time to wrap up any current projects so it’s not like Adobe is pulling the rug out from under your feet with no notice.

Why is this Happening?

While I don’t have any numbers, I don’t think it’s a secret that DPS SE never really caught on. It’s sort of an orphan product anyway. Not really an app, not really a book, not really anything. It’s caught between the worlds of a designer and a developer.  I would imagine the cost to maintain the platform for the very few using it, along with what is now an excellent, and in some ways a superior alternative, combined to make this move inevitable.

Fixed Layout EPUB

Adobe’s announcement points out that fixed-layout (FXL) EPUB has reached a point where it’s a better choice. Having investigated the features in it, I agree with them, especially for those that don’t understand the requirements that Apple has for Single Edition apps (mostly the fact that they need to be very interactive).

If Adobe had announced this earlier, I’d have been complaining about it quite loudly—because there was no alternative—but with the October release of InDesign CC2014, many of the interactive features available to DPS users are now a part of  FXL. Even native animations work! (I posted an article about this on my blog last week, before finding out about this announcement.)

The biggest drawback to the fixed-layout EPUB solution is the lack of compatible readers for these advanced EPUBs. Of course, the lack of readers is nothing compared to the limits of DPS SE, which is compatible with iPads only.

Still Want an App? There are Alternatives

The first, and easiest way around the loss of DPS SE is to find someone with a Pro or Enterprise account or to sign up for one yourself. Absent that, all is not totally lost here. While DPS Single Edition is great if you only want to publish on an iPad, it’s been evident from the start that Adobe was more concerned with multi-issue publishing. For anyone interested in Android, Amazon, or Windows market places, Single Edition was never a viable choice. Single Edition isn’t even compatible with iPhone!

Let’s take a look at the choices for other digital publishing services. The supported features and platforms they offer vary and in some cases (such as support for InDesign animations by some) are actually superior to DPS.

All of the above vary in cost, features, and device support so I can’t really recommend one over the other. None are free, but they all offer InDesign plugins as free downloads and they have free readers, similar to Adobe Content Viewer available on the supported stores. If you feel strongly that apps are the way to go for your project, do your own homework and pick the service that’s right for you.

But… don’t dismiss FXL out of hand. As I already mentioned, it is good choice for many projects such as illustration heavy books, and it’s very simple to create as well as to view fixed layout EPUBs. In fact, as long as you have a compatible reader on your computer or mobile device, it’s just about as simple as creating a PDF. If you want to learn more about it, Anne-Marie has a wonderful course on lynda.com.

I think one of the things that doomed DPS SE was the requirements that you actually had to be a bit of a developer to publish the app. Many users never got past the point of the requirement of having a Mac to create certificates for the app as well submitting it to Apple. Even if you got past that point, you’re up against Apple’s very inconsistent review and approval/rejection process. This is something you will continue to run into even with other vendors.

While the value of Creative Cloud hasn’t diminished all that much—and to the vast majority of users the absence of DPS SE won’t even be noticed—I’m hoping that come May 1, Adobe will be a open to helping those have projects they haven’t quite finished or that need revisions. We’ll have to wait until then to find out.


David’s Commentary

It’s never good when a company cuts a product or service, and it’s always worse when it’s something that you use. When the bus company cuts the route you take to work, or the appliance company stops making the replacement items you need to keep your vacuum cleaner working, it’s annoying and an inconvenience. So Adobe’s announcement that they’re dropping support for DPS SE from Creative Cloud memberships is frustrating. But… a few things to remember:

First, not that many people used DPS SE. If you’re one of the few, then this is terrible, but the vast majority of CC members didn’t make SE apps and probably wouldn’t do so anytime soon. There are a number of DPS users, of course, but my sense is that the vast majority of people who get excited about DPS end up with the pro or enterprise accounts, not SE.

Second, compare DPS SE to Fixed Layout EPUB (FXL):

  • DPS SE apps would only run on the iPad. FXL can be viewed on the iPad, iPhone, and any Mac running 10.9+. It can be viewed on Kobo devices, Readium-enabled Chrome browsers, and any Mac or Windows computer running Adobe’s free Digital Editions v4 software. That means your InDesign layouts could have a far wider reach than they could with DPS SE.
  • While FXL from InDesign is not mature yet, it’s getting significantly better and the fact that Adobe appears to be getting behind this open industry standard is very exciting. There’s no doubt that FXL cannot currently replicate what DPS can, but I think over time it might even be able to do more.
  • You can’t get analytics or multi-issue subscriptions with EPUB… but you can’t do that with DPS SE either (you need a higher level pro or enterprise DPS account to get that), so there’s no loss there.

For all these reasons, and more, I think that FXL is going to be a better publishing solution for many InDesign users… in fact, it may even replace PDF in a number of cases.

David Blatner is the co-founder of the Creative Publishing Network, InDesign Magazine, CreativePro Magazine, and the author or co-author of 15 books, including Real World InDesign. His InDesign videos at LinkedIn Learning (Lynda.com) are among the most watched InDesign training in the world.
You can find more about David at 63p.com

Follow on LinkedIn here
  • Frans van der Geest says:

    Yup, I’m a FXL ePub fan. Now, sadly, the build-in tools in InDesign for creating a Auto-play, auto-loop slide show… they are not there. Nor are scrollable frames. You will have to go to Edge/HTML5 to create such things. But hey: it is not May 1st 2015 yet, so who knows ;-)
    There is an article in Dutch for my Dutch readers about the end of DPS SE and FXL:
    https://fvdgeest-dtp.blogspot.nl/2014/11/dps-single-edition-wordt-afgeschaft.html

  • Eugene Tyson says:

    How long til they drop FXL EPub and focus on exporting HTML5? Always feels like it’s one step behind!

    • Eugene, I see your point, but in this case they’re not behind (yet) because there aren’t many (any?) good ways of distributing HTML5 documents. So FXL is actually something that people can use today.

    • Eugene, the problem here is responsive design. And transforming an InDesign layout into a responsive design is still today Mission Impossible.

    • Rubén Terrón says:

      Hopefully soon, and with the Dreamweaver/phonegap integration they dropped in the last version of DW too…

      I can’t understand how they are killing the DPS Single edition service…

  • In my lynda.com course Bob mentioned above (Creating Fixed Layout EPUBs from Adobe InDesign CC) I do have some videos showing how to add things like a remotely-hosted video and dual orientation to an FXL exported from InDesign.

    Even though the interior markup that InDesign creates is a little overboard, the point is it works, and the other point is it’s editable (unlike a published DPS app).

  • David, add this in your notes. Those who are still using iOS7 will be able to read Fixed-layout EPUB but embedded Edge animations will not play. This is why I repeat : if you need Overlays and a broader variety of platforms able to read your publication, you will still need an app.

  • Eugene Tyson says:

    All I mean is that they focused on Flash when epub became popular, leaving them behind, and now they’ve dropped DPS and focused on epub.

    Maybe it’s just me, but I see HTML5 or HTML6 being the leader in the future. As for responsive design, InDesign has liquid layouts, and I feel that this could be part of the solution for responsive design. Responsive designers start with mobile versions, then tablet versions then graduate to the full blown web version.

    By the time InDesign gets HTML support then there will be a new toy in town and we’re back at being 1 step behind.

    I always thought InDesign/Adobe were about being better than the competition. It’s pretty sad that we have to wait until someone else steps up to the HTML box before Adobe attempts to bridge that gap, but by then it will be too late.

    • Bob Levine says:

      Can we please get one thing clear…They are not dropping DPS. They are ending DPS SE as a free service for CC users. DPS is great. I love working with it, but SE is its own kind of animal and most people had a lot of issues with it. Had FXL EPUB in its current form existed before now I would have been recommending it over DPS SE, anyway.

      As far as HTML goes, what do you think an EPUB is? (Granted, you wouldn’t want to try and edit the HTML from a FXL EPUB).

      • Rubén Terrón says:

        As in adobe’s official forum, once again: I don’t agree with you. Adobe is clearly dropping the service for all the already published Apps and DPS Single edition users.

        There’s no other way of calling this.

    • Mr D. Pugpig says:

      Well, if you’re looking for someone to step up to the HTML box, I have to wave my trotters in the air a bit to get your attention. I’ve been proudly making the finest HTML based apps on the planet since 2011. But don’t just listen to a little hybrid like me. Have a look at some of the brands that have seen the light:

      https://pugpig.com/#!edition/editions_our-clients201402/article/page-285

      Every page of every edition of every publication in that gallery is responsive HTML.

      It’s not too late! I promise.

      #Woink

  • Rubén Terrón says:

    Really bad news, some people are trying to make us think that the epub FXL is a replacement for DPS Single edition, but this is not…

    First point, Adobe gave us a tool to publish and then ends the support of the tool making this announcement 6 months before the deadline. With no way to maintain previously released apps.

    Second, If we made an App is cause we didn’t want to publish an ebook. And as I said before this is not a replacement, these are different final products with different markets and stores (with different sales numbers…). A replacement would be to be able to maintain my already published work with the new FXL in the same platform that it’s already published, and where it has been purchased by many clients.

    Third point, the alternatives are using a multi-folio app that costs 500 per month and our service was free for being CC clients (Adobe’s only solution to the problem). Or to use a different platform, where first we have to purchase a third party licence, and second we have to migrate our Apps to work with the tools of this platform (we are talking about extra months of work), depending on the amount and complexity of your already published Apps.

    But the worse part, is that if apple releases the new iOS9 and your already published App crashes, you will have no way to fix it after May 2015. This is going to affect entire business that depends on this solution and they have contracts with their customers. There’s no time in six months to migrate our already published Apps.

    This is not the way to do this.

    • Patricia Gagnon says:

      Totally agree with the future iOS9 release… I just had to republish my two DPS SE apps because they crashed with iOS8. I’m really scared for the future iOS…

      Our customers won’t be happy and will ask for their money back for sure (they asked for it with iOS8 but we fixed it ASAP).

      • Rubén Terrón says:

        I recommend you to check Twixl plugin for Indesign if you’re in a hurry, it really works pretty close to DPS.

    • kate says:

      I agree, I think its totally irresponsible of Adobe to do this when people like myself have spent money on training courses to learn DPS SE and then built apps for clients. Now we have to re-train and tell the clients that their recently created apps are now obsolete. This is going to end up costing me big time as I will have to re-build clients apps at my own expense. Really not a funny situation adobe, thanks to you adobe, I am in some serious trouble!

  • Eugene Tyson says:

    Absolutely Bob, I meant DPS as in the spirit of the post, for the SE. Thanks for clarifying.

    ePub is not HTML5 – that’s for sure.

    I appreciate all the work that has gone into FXL ePub and I truly do appreciate it. It’s fantastic to have that now within InDesign.

    My general frustration is the lack of foresight by Adobe into future technologies. I’ve always felt FXL ePub should have been in the first iteration of epub export from InDesign.

    I am very frustrated by it all, Bob.

  • Don’t forget that Adobe CC membership does offer PhoneGap, which lets you convert HTML to iOS and Android apps. You can use a tool such as in5 from ajarproductions.com to export HTML5 and then convert it to an app.

    • Rubén Terrón says:

      Hi there,

      Phonegap support in Dreamweaver was also dropped in last october DW release. Anyway, Phonegap is not the way to migrate a DPS built app.

      Would have been a good idea to integrate PG with Indesign supporting all the overlays and with new features for single edition users, for building html5 compatible Apps (supporting several OS as Corvoda/PG is capable). But, dropping DPS single edition for all the existing users?

      Please, no more excuses in this site about Adobe’s DPS decision. No excuses for this.

  • Eugene Tyson says:

    Why is in5 even needed? I have to admit in5 is great for simple layouts and I love in5.

    Anything more complex and in5 doesn’t work. Bought it, tried it, submitted samples to in5 and got fixes and nothing suited, admittedly that’s just me.

    InDesign should go from InDesign to App much like it goes from InD to FXL epub.

    • The problem, as far as I can tell, is that building apps is not the same as building documents. People want to build apps as easily as they build documents, but you just can’t — even with DPS, you basically have to think like a software developer more than a publisher.

      Adobe kept trying to scale DPS down to the individual or small business user, and they just couldn’t do it. I think it’s just not that kind of tool. So my sense is that Adobe is just letting go of that market and letting smaller companies (such as Twixl and Aquafadas) fill the void.

      • Eugene Tyson says:

        That’s exactly my point though David, Adobe should have been concentrating on App and HTML5 and been the pioneers in this field.

        But they’re not. It’s 1 disappointing announcement after another! 1 failed field after another.

        We all want InDesign to be our design program, print or web or epub! That’s what we need. But it’s not happening.

  • Cody says:

    Disappointed to hear the news … I have spent the past year building up my business based on DPS Single Edition. I use my Creative Cloud license to create interactive guides for clients. The Pro and Enterprise licenses won’t work – so I need to see how ePUB will work or explore the possibility of using 3rd party companies like Aquafadas. I will adapt. :|

    • Rubén Terrón says:

      This is not the way to stop a service like this. Please, if you consider, write a complaint in adobe’s official forums.

  • I wrote up my own thoughts about DPS SE vs. FXL on lynda.com today:

    https://www.lynda.com/articles/dps-fixed-layout-epub

    • Rubén Terrón says:

      Hi, I think comparison should be done between Indesign FXL and Ibooks author, and they are pretty close (0 cost, etc…) However, DPS was a different product to build APPS, for App stores.

      My thought is that you are wrong trying to compare this two different products for different markets. People’s is not going to migrate their Apps from the Applestore to the Ibookstore. Firstly, this is not the idea for anyone. Cause people want their products in the Applestore.

      If adobe does not change their mind, DPS Single edition users will look for other solution to build Apps, and maybe some of them stop their Adobe’s CC subscription. By example, I think I will do it.

      • Rubén Terrón says:

        I would like to say that Adobe could have improved their product with some of the Pro editions features, supporting other platforms (Iphone, Android Apps, Windows 8.1 Apps), or giving access to In-App purchases, notifications and other advanced functions. In fact, many users would pay for some of this features in their DPS Single edition (not the full 500 p/month Pro edition price).

        And, once again, Epub FXL Layout can not do anything of this. No way to In-App purchases, no way to notifications, no way to access to hardware functions and OS APIS, and many more features that an App can do and will be impossible to perform in the Ibookstore.

        Ibookstore is for books.
        Applestore for Apps.

        So simple.

        No way to compare this.

  • Companies want to get their interactive document on mobile devices. That’s the main thing. It’s not App Store vs. eBookstore.

    3 or 4 years ago, when Apple definitively said “no Flash” and PDFs used Flash for rich media and interactivity, we InDesign users were cast adrift. How to help our employers and our clients publish to mobile? Then came DPS. Aha! Here’s a way, and actually the *only* way — build an app and have people download it from an App store.

    Until then, who would’ve thought that a college’s catalog or an agency’s portfolio would be an *app*? That you’d have to become a freakin app developer to distribute your brochure on an iPad for heaven’s sake. No one.

    Now here’s another way. You can make an interactive digital publication FROM InDesign and distribute it not just to iPads but also to Androids, for free. You don’t have to go through a store. You can have people download it from your website, or just attach the thing to an email!

    But if you want to go through a store, then yes, you can. Yes, it’s called an ebookstore (iBookstore, Google Play Books, etc.), but how does that make any less sense for, say, a photo essay or an annual report than calling it an app and forcing people to search and download it from an app store?

    It will just take a small shift for many of us to become used to distributing via the iBookstore versus the App store. Why would our clients care … it’s getting their interactive document working on mobile devices that’s the main thing. Bam! it’s done. Faster, and much easier, than with DPS. And now when they ask you “can our customers search the document for keywords, can they select text and copy/paste it into an email or their notes, etc.” you can say YES.

    Now, there are many features that DPS (or Twixl etc) bring to the table that the fixed layout format can’t touch. Absolutely. I love the kind of magic that DPS can bring to a pub, and my clients love all the back end stuff too. But FXL has its own feature set, and it’s still in its infancy. Who knows what’s coming down the pike.

    • Collin says:

      @Anita Do you have business line I can reach you on? I have a solution for you to get back your single issue clients!

      • Anita says:

        Hi Collin

        Many thanks for your kind response, I really appreciate it.

        I’ve been in touch with my clients’ best part of the day and they have decided, and I totally agree, to employ a large London Agency to create their apps. I must admit they’re just upset about this as I am, but business is business. (They’ve been wonderful actually, as I’ve known them for several years.) However, I will be creating presentations for them, which is something!

        Thanks once again for your response.

        Anita

  • Moridin says:

    So how do I create an FXL for the iBookstore that works on both iPads and iPhones?

  • Moridin: The same file will work on each. You just upload one epub. However like a PDF it’ll just scale to fit on an iPhone. I demo this in one of my tutorial movies (pros/cons of fixed layout vs. reflowable epubs) in the lynda.com course mentioned above. Most FXL developers design the pub to be read on larger tablets.

  • JR Boulay says:

    David, do you mean there is currently not any FXL EPub reader available for Android ???

  • JR Boulay says:

    Now I will use FXL EPub for interactive eBooks, and the IN5 plugin for apps (exported in HTML5 and wrapped into native Android/iOS/etc apps).

  • Eugene Tyson says:

    Basically FXL ePub are not responsive designs, and that’s what clients are looking for these days. I appreciate that FXL ePub is in it’s infancy and I hope it starts using the Liquid Layouts so we can start delivering on projects without having to have a third party involved in getting from InDesign to different devices.

  • FXL epubs can definitely be read on Android devices: Kobo app, Google Play Books, Gitden Reader are the three I know of.

    FXL epubs are not responsive, by design! Thus the name. Fixed. Otherwise, make a reflowable epub.

    BUT I hear you Eugene. How cool would it be to have a responsively-designed FXL. (I don’t think there is such a thing for an app.) I think we’ll be there sooner rather than later.

    • Rubén Terrón says:

      99% of the Apps are responsible, all the native programming apps, and all the Adobe’s Phonegap Apps based in Apache Cordova are responsible as they use html5 with jquery mobile technologies.

  • Anita says:

    I have read all the posts re: Adobe DPS Single Edition and sympathise with the exasperation felt by everyone concerned.

    This latest news has, today, lost me 2 contracts, so I have cancelled my subscription for the Creative Cloud and told Adobe in no uncertain terms exactly what I think of them, their policies and serious lack of loyalty to their customers.

    I have had trouble with InDesign malfunctioning for way over 12 months and have replaced my hardware to cope – to no avail. This latest news was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

    It’s about time Adobe had some serious competition and I just wish that would appear sooner rather than later.

  • F vd Geest says:

    Wow Anita, I must say if your business and membership of Creative Cloud depends on DPS SE and two clients you have more to worry about…
    That said: did you explain all benefits of FXL ePub to those clients to keep them on board?

  • JR Boulay says:

    PhoneGap is not alone, there are many solutions around the web to wrap HTML5 into a natine app.

    • Rubén Terrón says:

      But keep in mind this is not so easy, you will have problems to deal with html5 audio in Android, by example. In fact the only way is with the media plugin. And this is not like importing an audio file in ID…

      I think this is what people would like, ID and PG integration for native Apps. And same native html5 for ebooks.

      Just, cross fingers for not to see Adobe dropping Phonegap in the coming days ;)

  • JR Boulay says:

    @Anita : send me a private email ;-)

  • Anita says:

    I am a one-woman business and have a small but loyal client list. For the past 6-8 months I have been cajoling and persuading 2 clients, in particular, to progress to DPS SE. At the end of last week, they agreed and wanted to sign a contract. Then Adobe, put the spanner in the works and I have had to withdraw in fairness to these clients.

    I explained, in full, the benefits of FXL ePub but they didn’t want to know. Apparently, according to their representative, I did too good a job selling DPS!! “He who pays the piper calls the tune.”

    The other part of my business is devoted to designing presentations using Keynote, PowerPoint and formerly InDesign, so thankfully I have something to fall back on.

    But I just felt I had to make a stand for the “little people” in this industry. :) :) So, I am standing on my soap box now!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;)

  • Anita says:

    No, no need to apologise! Thank you for your response.

  • I have been committed to InDesign and CC for over a year and have touted it on my blog https://AuthorsAndPublishersDigitalReview.com. Now, as far as I can tell, it’s defunct for authors and small publishers. One should be able to create once and publish everywhere. InDesign and DPS got us almost all the way there. But now InDesign is just a glorified print publishing program, and print is a big fat deadend.

    Those who think that they can give up the app stores are overlooking the fact that apps come with huge marketplaces attached. iTunes apps and Google Play apps are far larger marketplaces than iBooks or Google Play Books. If you’re distributing something, perhaps that’s not important. But if you’re selling something (e.g., digital books), it’s extremely important.

    The fact is that authors and small publishers are being thrown to the dogs by Adobe and will need to look elsewhere for software.

    The bottom line is that to commit to one software provider is not a smart business decision. It could lead to ruin as now seems the case with CC. Rather, cobble together a series of good programs that get you where you want to be. If one programs fails for whatever reasons, it’s just one clog in the system, not the whole system. That has been the practice for most of us in the past. With the introduction of CC, we were introduced to one-system-does-all, which seemed like a good idea at the time. Now it seems like a very bad idea.

    The pricing on most of the alternatives to CC and DPS is outrageous. Nonetheless, there is one publishing system that shows a lot of promise: Monaca (https://monaca.mobi). And the pricing is reasonable. I would love to hear of digital publishing systems that haven’t yet been mentioned in this article.

    • Joseph, I’m sorry, but I really think your comments are out of line and wrong. First, very few small publishers or authors were using DPS SE. Second, of the ones who wanted to, many of them couldn’t get over Apple’s very steep submission requirements (over 70 pages of step-by-step instructions!). Then, of the ones who passed that, many of them were denied by Apple because they were too book like, and not suitable for the app store.

      The Apple app store is just not a good place to sell books.

      But your comment that InDesign is “just a glorified print publishing program” is, frankly, an offensive mistruth, especially in the newest version. I regularly create interactive (onscreen) PDF, EPUB, and FXL files, and InDesign is one of the best tools on the market to do so.

      Seriously, how many DPS SE applications did you create and publish in the last couple of years?

      • I think that publishing book apps is valuable for some publishers and some publications and may have more of a long-term future for all than publishing ebooks. And Adobe seems to be abandoning that aspect of publishing. Certainly for PDFs, EPUBs, and other formats InDesign remains a valuable software tool that I shall continue to use. But I still like the idea of one program publish everywhere.

        Unfortunately, I’ve been concentrating on marketing since I wrote my first comments in November. (I’m a one-person publisher.) The only production I’ve done since is to experiment with Monaca a little more using HTML and JavaScripts. It seems to work like a charm and is very reasonably priced.

        In any event, this thread has a wealth of information, and I appreciate all the contributions.

  • Eugene Tyson says:

    Well Anne-Marie, maybe it will be renamed to Flowable Extensible Layout (FXL) in the future.

    I truly hope Adobe are working on this.

  • JR Boulay says:

    I had made my decision long before the announcement, DPS SE never was a reliable way for creating apps.

  • Reviewing TWIXL, it appears that it relies on DPS and doesn’t work without DPS? Is that right? If so, maybe it will adapt to the new reality by next May.

    Mag+ is far too expensive for authors and small publishers.

    Monaca is supposed to be easy for non-programmers to use. But for a non-programmer like me, it looks intimidating, even though it’s based on HTML5 and CSS, which I can handle. One of these days soon I’ll try it.

    • Joseph: No, I don’t think Twixl has any dependence on DPS. It’s a whole different system. (Maybe it uses some of Adobe’s authoring tools? Not sure. But that wouldn’t matter.)

      Monica appears to be based on PhoneGap, which is based on HTML5 export. I would call it a “hybrid” solution. I discuss PhoneGap and other options here:
      https://creativepro.com/difference-epub-dps-pdf.php

    • Greg says:

      @Joseph, TWIXL is dependent of DPS, evolving on their own. Mag+ seems reasonably priced for single issue publishing in my eyes. What/why do you think it’s too expensive? Looking over their client list, it appears they have many SMB’s using the platform.

      Monaca is indeed a hybrid HTML5/content design solution, where code elements are exported.

      • @Joseph @Greg This is Pieter, the lead developer from Twixl media. Just to emphasise, Twixl does not have any dependence on DPS. You only need Adobe InDesign CS6 or newer.

        We do use some of the standard tools available in InDesign (such as e.g. multistate objects, sounds, movies, …) but these are native features of InDesign, not of DPS. For Twixl, you don’t need the Folio Overlay or Folio Builder panels.

  • F vd Geest says:

    There seem to be some misunderstanding here: DPS is NOT canceled! Only the final proces of creating the app you need to send to iTunes, and this proces was included in Creatve Cloud and known ad Single Edition, is canceled.
    So you can still design, create, test, show (on desktop, on tablet) and yes even share your design with clients.
    Only the final creation of an app going to the Apple Store is no longer free. So best suggestion: find a company that will do that last stage for you (yes, extra cost involved, I know and hear you), no need to loose clients!

    • Anita says:

      There’s no misunderstanding as far as I am concerned. I can’t offer my clients the whole package owing to Adobe’s blasé attitude towards its customers. Why don’t they just make up their minds and stop messing people about.

      You can’t play fast and loose with clients’ telling them one day there’s no extra cost but the next day there is.
      Clients’ have budgets, they haven’t got a money pit like Adobe.

      • Greg says:

        Agreed Anita, there are other companies that have the featureset of Adobe that also place customer service above everything else. For single issue publishing, Mag+ is a great option.

  • F vd Geest says:

    Ah yes, I am also following the DPS forums and there is more misunderstanding than there is here indeed, sorry.

    • Frans, no I think you make a very good point: Most people do not realize that you can still use InDesign to create the DPS folios (for free) and then hand them off to another company to do the publishing part. But true, as Anita says, it’s annoying that this would result in additional fees (after May 2015).

  • Anita says:

    Thanks Greg for reminding me about Mag+.

    I’ll have a another word with my clients’ and see what they have to say. At the moment, they are totally fed up with the whole process.

  • Pablo says:

    You can also use büttonpublish to create your apps: https://buttonpublish.com/

    Bütton is a Plug-in for InDesign to create and distribute digital magazines. It works with InDesign and it is very easy to use.

    It comes with many native functionalities and animations that are going to give your magazine a better new look.

    The plug-in and tutorial are free, you can get logging in our website. You do not pay for downloads, they are unlimited. You can preview the articles you are designing any time you want and if you have some doubts you can contact us and we are going to help you right away!!

    I invite you all visit our website and download the plug-in, I’m 100% sure that you are going to love bütton, a new option for you to consider!

    Thanks!

    • Anita says:

      Hi Rich,

      Many thanks for the links. The only one I hadn’t heard of was “Future Folio,”so I had a quick look this morning.

      The rest I have followed avidly. Aquafadas was recommended by Pariah Burke in his 2012 book on InDesign and DPS; I attended a webinar given by Mag+ about 2 years ago, which was interesting; and I took course on Lynda.com, which was given by the owner of Ajar.

      I also had a look at your site – it’s really interesting stuff! WOW!

      Thanks again,

      Anita

      • Hi Anita,

        don’t forget to take a look at Twixl Publisher. It’s really similar to Adobe DPS and provides you with a very easy migration path as we can recuperate Adobe DPS documents very easily.

        Pieter

  • Rich says:

    And…

    Button, looks cool too!

    Rich

  • Bob Levine says:

    Keep in mind that before SE was included in Creative Cloud it cost $395 to create the apps. I’m going to bet that you can find an Enterprise or Pro account holder willing to do it for you for that or even less.

    Yes, it will cost you, but not so much that you can lose that cost in the fee for the work.

    This really appears that Adobe is taking the same business model approach as its competitors and separating DPS from all other programs. Let’s wait a bit and see what’s coming.

    • Anita says:

      I totally agree with your comments regarding pricing etc., however, I have spent so many, many months converting two sceptics to go for DPS SE that Adobe’s action was the last straw.

      When asked last week if there would be any extra costs, I “confidently” said: No! None whatsoever. Then Adobe dropped its bombshell. I have known these guys a long time and I have always kept my word. I felt I had let them down, through no fault of my own.

      Another thing, they are extremely pernickety and they didn’t want me to share the load with another organisation, as I put up with their nonsense. (Their words not mine). So, it’s far better for them to go to a design studio who can handle the whole package.

      On top of all that, during the past year I replaced my hardware as I was having trouble with Adobe apps, in particular, InDesign. What a waste of time and money that was, as it made no difference – I was still paying through the nose for apps that were malfunctioning. We, on the other side of the pond pay a bit more than our American cousins for Adobe software. It wouldn’t be so bad if it worked properly!!!

      Enough is enough!

      • Pugpig says:

        @Anita – If you’re based in London and happen to be Leicester Square, feel free to pop in for a coffee and we can show you some amazing things … :-)

  • Anita says:

    Wil do, Pieter. Thanks for mentioning it.

  • James says:

    I’m in a similar boat to Anita and I’m deeply upset that Adobe have dropped this. I’ve got two apps planned in the new year that a client has agreed to and existing apps that will undoubtedly break with iOS 9. Adobe haven’t responded to any criticism at all and it does worry me a lot that all my eggs are in one basket with all my working tools. It’s disingenuous to start talking about Apple’s approval process and we’d be better off with books – obviously we got apps approved and clients are happy and don’t want books. It would be reckless not to start thinking about Pixelmator and even Quark so as somebody else said, you only lose one part of the puzzle when companies randomly drop support for tools you depend and build your business on.

    I’d like to know:

    1) Could Adobe not just charge us a fee for one-off apps? I wouldn’t mind paying as long as I knew what it was and could build into my estimates and it wasn’t ongoing. Say even £500 an app. I’d pay it to not learn a whole new toolset.

    2) If not, who are the pro users who would be willing to publish my apps? Anybody have a list?

  • F vd Geest says:

    Maybe a smart move for Adobe would be now to lower the price for CC by say 10 dollars/Euro’s a month to ‘compensate’…

  • Anita says:

    Why on earth would you remove my post giving James information regarding pro users willing to publish his apps?

    There was nothing untoward in that post.

  • Anita says:

    Sorry, James, they’ve removed it again. Have a look at Rich and Pablo’s posts.

    • Anita, I’m sorry your posts disappeared. Our system automatically removes comments that it thinks might be spam (e.g. two or more urls, etc.).

      That said, I believe the links you provided were exactly the same as several people have mentioned above. This comment thread is already dangerously long, so it’s better to point to earlier comments and links than repeat them.

      Also, several companies are starting filling the comments with “our product is great!” types of posts, often without identifying themselves as working at that company. This is spam and we will often remove it. This blog post is meant to be educational.

      • Anita says:

        Hi David,

        Thank you for your response – I really appreciate it, as I was a little upset that such a harmless post could be removed.

        You mention that the system automatically removes posts with two or more urls, but that didn’t apply to Rich’s post, where there are more than just two!

        However, I included two pro publishing website links for James, as he finds himself out on a limb and as I researched same, I thought these sites could possibly help him out of his predicament.

        I am not affiliated to any company – I have been freelance for several years and my former university lecturers are my clients!

        Granted the blog post is educational, and I support that wholeheartedly, but isn’t it meant to help as well?

        A lot of people, including myself, subscribed to the Creative Cloud when Adobe held out its carrot – DPS SE. Now it is going to be withdrawn! Obviously, there are going to be a lot of unhappy people. However, move on we must, and hopefully find something more suitable to our clients’ requirements.

        Once again, thank you for your response.

  • Cody says:

    After reading through these comments, researching various sites, and doing my homework based on my business needs, here’s what I’ve decided to do in hopes that it helps someone else:
    It appears that most business models have options to pay $250-500 per Single Edition apps. Not bad. Others like Aquafadas have options that would allow the client to pay $99/mo. to have a Single Edition app. In my case, I need to create approximately 20+ apps per year for various clients. I do not want them to have to pay more than my design fee. Therefore, I chose to go with Twixl. For $950/yr. I can create an unlimited number of Single Edition apps. That seems to be the best fit.
    In addition, I like that Twixl makes it easy for me to convert my past SE apps created with DPS. I’m sure that once a new iOS comes around I’ll need to convert them all. In working with their toolset, I’ve found it very easy to learn and adapt from what I already knew with Adobe DPS. Plus, I get to create for Android devices now too!
    So yes, I have to pay an additional $950/yr. but with additional options as well. In my opinion, where one door closes, another one opens. I’m happy in the long run. Hope this helps.

    • James says:

      Thank you to my freelance and small business colleagues. I reckon Cody has got it. 1) Create unlimited apps with a yearly subscription at a reasonable price 2) Convert DPS apps to their format – that’s the deciding factor. Twixl it is then! I note there is a demo version to try out also.

  • In terms of alternative to the DPS Single Edition, now you have the iPress Single Edition.
    iPress is a new solution of Digital Publishing proposing a dedicated desktop software, iPress Builder, to create interactive contents.
    Obviously you can import contents (InDesign, PDF) to integrate the iPress solution in an existing workflow.
    It is really the most simple software on the market to create interactive contents. A Powerpoint or Keynote user can use the iPress Builder at 100% in 2 days!!
    On the reader side, iPress created a new concept with an “on-demand” tool, named Pixie. The Pixie reinvent the rollover for a touch screen.
    Discover iPress on our website: http://www.ipress.com
    Jean

  • JR Boulay says:

    Jean, can ipress publish for Android devices too?

  • barbara says:

    Hey guys,
    there is another solution – CoverPage – https://www.coverpageapp.com/
    – supporting Single apps
    – they have special offer for Christmas at this time – 2 platforms for the price of one

    [editor’s note: Barbara works for CoverPageApp.]

  • Peter Loebel says:

    So many alternatives. And here one more.

    From InDesign to HTML and SVG. “Flexible Editorial Design”

    http://www.flexedd.com/index_en.html

    Peter
    I am the developer :-)

  • Hi

    There are plenty of alternatives to DPS. I work for http://www.tablish.co.uk and we have set up a special ‘rescue package’ for existing DPS Single Edition users. https://www.tablish.co.uk/tablish-is-a-great-alternative-to-adobe-dps-single-edition-users/

    Matt

  • Robin says:

    I also think it’s sad that Adobe is dropping the SE. But I thought I’d also point out the quality of one of the digital publishing services. I have not used many of those mentioned, but I know that Aquafadas is not at all reliable. I have used that rather than DPS while working at a previous job. It often crashed InDesign, especially when trying to change between Horizontal and Vertical (mainly in vertical) orientations. Also, edit undo takes clicking over 20 times in order to actually reach the previous action. You can say I have a negative perspective, but it has been much easier and reliable to use DPS.

  • Ed says:

    Nice to see the many alternatives to DPS. Are there any that are specifically geared to use for internal use only that bypass the App Store completely?

    I have a few clients who just want their internal reports as apps on their ipads but will run a mile at the mention of App Store and for varying reasons can’t or won’t keep the .ipa files on their own servers.

  • Collin says:

    Morning Ed! You should checkout Mag+, as they allow organizations to create & publish internal apps that completely bypass the app platform stores, as well as allowing self-hosting.

  • Ed says:

    Hi Pieter and Collin,

    I’ve already had lengthy chats with both Twixl and Mag+, I’d just be interested to see if there are any options out there that deal more specifically with internal apps.

  • Yߋu can, of course a long and tedious to write “why”, but onee or a few examples tto answer this question much better than, say okolonauchny uniiversity textbook, which in most cases, obsolete before it comes ouut “in thee light. Butt every coin has twoo sides, beong business women aalso hqve maqny disadvantages. Think about thee kinss oof accessories thwt could go with yolur product, orr howw youu couild provide add-ons tto your services.

  • Hi all,

    Maybe this can help: I compiled a list of DSP alternatives categorized on the need they solve : https://blog.readz.com/digital-publishing-platforms-tools/

    Cheers
    Bart

  • Jean-Renaud Boulay says:

    Thank you Bart.
    Nice work!

  • CBerthier says:

    Bonjour je cherche une licence DPS pro pour editer mon application. Merci de me contacter si vous avez cela, idéalment à Montréal.

  • kenny says:

    Dear all,

    Thanks for the article. Of course I forgot about the abrupt cancellation of the license…

    But I found a great Alternative called d!NK. http://www.dink.eu

    You can build interactive and appealing apps from indesign, Photoshop. They also provide a great powerpoint plugin that helped me to create order forms and push it to my customer’s app.

    They also support Interactive PDF’s, such as a digital signature, forms and annotations.

    Maybe it’s good to put them in the alternative solutions so other people can find them as well!

    Kenny

  • >