December 6 2006 • 3:33 AM

Copy-and-Paste vs. Place

While I’m getting my next (overdue) videocast finished, I’ve been answering a lot of questions by e-mail, so I thought I’d step out of my little corner of InDesignSecrets.com and contribute one of these answers to the blog.

Brendan said:

“I have a inherited a job where I need to cut and paste photographic images from existing Illustrator .eps files (the photos are embedded, no links) into an InDesign file and would like to have a greater understanding of what effect this may have upon the image once it is pasted into the InDesign file. ie., will there be any loss in quality, resolution, colour-space, etc.”

If you’re copying and pasting from Illustrator, you are effectively disassociating the graphics from their Illustrator origins. Vector art copied from Illustrator and pasted into InDesign becomes an InDesign object (or object), making it fully editable from within InDesign, and no longer linked in any way to the original Illustrator file.

If you’re copying and pasting embedded photographic images from Illustrator into InDesign (which I’m not quite sure why you would…but I’ll address that below), you are bringing all of the image data into InDesign. A way to confirm this is to use the built-in Preflight function (Shift-Command-Option-F on the Mac / Shift-Ctrl-Alt-F on the PC), which will give you information on the attributes of the pasted image. A copied image pasted into InDesign is automatically embedded. The screen shot below shows that. Notice that the image has an “effective ppi” of 225 pixels per inch.

id_preflight.jpg

This image shows up as CMYK because the Illustrator file from which it was copied used a CMYK color space. If it had come from an Illustrator EPS file with an RGB color space, it would have retained the RGB attributes, and been flagged as such by InDesign’s preflight function.

If this is the working method you need to use, the preflight function will be a good way to double-check that you’re getting into your document the type and quality of image you’re looking for.

However, I have to ask: why copy and paste these images into InDesign? Why not just place them using the Place command? There are two distinct advantages to this:

First…file size. Each image you embed increases the InDesign document’s file size by whatever the size of all that image data is. In a very short time, your InDesign document could be unmanageably large. I did a test of a 5″x 7″ image at 225 pixels per inch and the embedded version resulted in an 8.8 MB InDesign file, but by using File –> Place to import the Illustrator EPS image made only a 1.2MB file.

Second…what if something were to happen to your InDesign file? Suppose it gets corrupted, deleted, or otherwise lost. All of your images are gone with it. You’re faced with the task of re-copying and re-pasting the images from the original EPS files (provided you still have them).

While you’re not losing any quality in your images with the method you describe, I recommend re-thinking the workflow for better efficiency. Either just place the images from the original EPS files, or better yet, get them out of Illustrator altogether and into Photoshop. Personally, I prefer to keep my bitmaps and vectors in their respective applications. It helps me mentally organize them better. I see a Photoshop file, and I think raster image. I see an Illustrator file, and I think vectors. I know there’s crossover (vectors can exist in Photoshop and images can exist in Illustrator), but I’m a fan of keeping things simple.

Brendan also had concerns about this statement from the InDesign Help file:

“When copying and pasting a graphic from another document into an InDesign document, InDesign does not create a link to the graphic in the Links palette. The graphic may be converted by the system clipboard during the transfer, so both image quality and print quality may be lower in InDesign than in the graphic’s original application.”

The key phrase in this is “may be.” There are issues to be aware of. For instance, if I copy a 5″x 7″ high resolution image out of an Illustrator EPS file and want to pasted it into a new Photoshop file, Photoshop will use the clipboard information for the physical size of the image (5″x 7″), but it will us its previous pixel-per-inch values when a new Photoshop image is created using the default “Clipboard” setting in the New Document dialog box.

Therefore, if the last Photoshop image I created was 72 pixels-per-inch, Photoshop will want to make the 5″x 7″ image in the clipboard into a file at that resolution, instead of 5″x 7″ at its actual resolution. So, yes, under some circumstances, you may be subject to the whims of clipboard and other system functions. All the more reason to avoid the copy-and-paste method…just to be safe.

12 Responses discussing this post. Add yours below.

  1. saeid
    January 6th, 2007 • 12:28 pm • Link

    In freehand when we embed an image we can edit it with external image editor (like photoshop) or extract it. In indesign we can unembed an embeded linked file If original file’s name and location not changed. but there is no this capability in AI.

  2. Jeff
    January 24th, 2007 • 2:30 pm • Link

    In addition, I have had issues when copy and pasting raster images from Photoshop to InDesign and then exporting to PDF. The PDF that is produced has horrible horizontal artifacts through the images. When placing the same images, those artifacts are gone. I haven’t explored this thoroughly but thought maybe someone might have come across the same problem. The copy/paste-save-to-pdf method is great for sending off drafts and I would love for it to work properly. Any ideas?
    Thanks.

  3. December 4th, 2007 • 1:48 pm • Link

    Is there a way to paste large vector data into indesign? I can obviously paste an .ai file but many times I would rather have more flexibility inside indesign rather than moving back and forth between programs. I didn’t know if there was a way to increase the maximum amount of vector data before it cuts you off and converts it to an .eps. Any thoughts on this??

    Thanks,

  4. December 4th, 2007 • 2:25 pm • Link

    Matt — As far as I know, changing the threshhold for vector data in InDesign is not an available option. When you say “large” I’m assuming you mean a large amount of vector information, not a big simple vector graphic. The two things that concern me about bringing in large amounts of vector data are (a) loss of Illustrator-specific features that InDesign doesn’t support, and (b) manageability of that vector data within InDesign.

    I love that I can bring a vector shape from Illustrator into my layouts via copy-and-paste, and then change the transparency, stroke, fill, etc. without having to make multiple external versions. However, InDesign handles vectors in a more clunky way than Illustrator, so complex vector work becomes harder to manage, not easier…at least in my experience.

    But I’m sure our resident die-hards — David, Anne-Marie, and Sandee (Vector Babe) Cohen — have some opinions, theories, or workarounds…so I’ll open up this discussion to them as well. Any thoughts, folks?

  5. David Blatner
    December 4th, 2007 • 3:58 pm • Link

    No, I agree with you, Michael. Use each program for what it’s good for. Complex art should stay in Illustrator. It’s so incredibly easy to option/alt-double-click on the art to open it back up in Illustrator. It’s just not worth the risk of putting all your eggs in one basket.

  6. December 4th, 2007 • 7:46 pm • Link

    Thanks for your input Michael and David! I think you’re definitely right, it’s not worth the risk. I was just curious about that.

    The particular vector file that I’m working on isn’t very complex but there are a lot of paths. It’s more or less a map.

  7. Brian QUinn
    May 26th, 2008 • 7:43 pm • Link

    I’m trying to drag and drop, or copy and paste, vector items from Illustrator CS2 to Indesign CS2 (Max OSX). Every time, InDesign crashes. The only way I can import is to place, which leaves them rasterised and uneditable No one else I’ve spoken to has this problem. Any ideas out there…?

  8. David Blatner
    May 26th, 2008 • 7:54 pm • Link

    I’m not sure what the problem could be, Brian. Have you tried rebuilding your preferences? (see Popular Posts in the navigation area.)

  9. al
    August 10th, 2008 • 7:20 pm • Link

    i have a problem with a picture place in indesign.
    i have put 40 pictures into my book, and this i cant.
    i don’t know why this picture is so special.
    what is the problem? what kind of picture (this one is jpg, and i allready have jpg inside my book) indesign do not support?

  10. David Blatner
    August 10th, 2008 • 7:25 pm • Link

    If you cannot import one image, it usually means something is wrong with it. Try to open the file in Photoshop and do a Save As. That typically “fixes” it.

  11. Amit Goyal
    June 3rd, 2009 • 10:13 pm • Link

    Is there any shortcut to extract images from Indesign and convert them as link

  12. September 21st, 2009 • 9:49 am • Link

    Sign: yyams Hello!!! punht and 843dhursyvpxd and 7004 My Comments: Cool!

Subscribe to the Discussion

Get the ongoing discussion surrounding "Copy-and-Paste vs. Place" delivered to you. Click here to subscribe via RSS.

Leave a Reply

You can use limited HTML tags, such as <em></em> for emphasis/italics and <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

InDesignSecrets reserves the right to edit and/or remove posts and comments.