<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Rid of That Absurd Section Prefix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php/rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php</link>
	<description>InDesignSecrets Blog and Podcast</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-15182</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-15182</guid>
		<description>Looks like the script works as long as the numbering is set to "Start page numbering at". All of my pages are set to "Automatic Numbering" and the script will not remove the prefix.

thanks for the script though. It was a great idea. Hopefully it can be made to work in both cases someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the script works as long as the numbering is set to &#8220;Start page numbering at&#8221;. All of my pages are set to &#8220;Automatic Numbering&#8221; and the script will not remove the prefix.</p>
<p>thanks for the script though. It was a great idea. Hopefully it can be made to work in both cases someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shorter</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-668</guid>
		<description>This script sounds wonderful, however I'm still with CS1. How could I change it to function as intended with CS1?

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This script sounds wonderful, however I&#8217;m still with CS1. How could I change it to function as intended with CS1?</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne-Marie</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne-Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dave! That's another neat little "best practice" technique to add to our arsenal here. (And thanks to Steve for helping us all figure this out.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dave! That&#8217;s another neat little &#8220;best practice&#8221; technique to add to our arsenal here. (And thanks to Steve for helping us all figure this out.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Saunders</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Some off-line discussion with Steve and further experimentation reveals this:

1. My script is good for cleaning up after-the-fact. It does nothing to prime the contents of that field if you subsequently make a new section.

2. That value, though is sticky. If you make a new section and then hit tab followed by delete, that will eliminate the "Sec1:" prefix for the section you are now creating AND prime the field for the next section you create -- from then on, in that document, they'll be blank.

This suggests that the prefix is a document level preference held somewhere, but a search of the InDesign Scripting Reference fails to show any other reference to section prefix, so, if you want to avoid using my script to clean-up after the fact, just hit tab-delete the first time you create a section.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some off-line discussion with Steve and further experimentation reveals this:</p>
<p>1. My script is good for cleaning up after-the-fact. It does nothing to prime the contents of that field if you subsequently make a new section.</p>
<p>2. That value, though is sticky. If you make a new section and then hit tab followed by delete, that will eliminate the &#8220;Sec1:&#8221; prefix for the section you are now creating AND prime the field for the next section you create &#8212; from then on, in that document, they&#8217;ll be blank.</p>
<p>This suggests that the prefix is a document level preference held somewhere, but a search of the InDesign Scripting Reference fails to show any other reference to section prefix, so, if you want to avoid using my script to clean-up after the fact, just hit tab-delete the first time you create a section.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Saunders</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Steve,

That sounds weird (although I'm glad you found a workaround). My script wipes out the prefixes and then tells them to not appear. So if you have a document where a prefix survived the script and then had the temerity to appear anyway, I'd be interested in seeing it. If you can reproduce the problem in a small document can you send it (or perhaps a .inx version of it) to support@pdsassoc.com please.

Thanks,

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>That sounds weird (although I&#8217;m glad you found a workaround). My script wipes out the prefixes and then tells them to not appear. So if you have a document where a prefix survived the script and then had the temerity to appear anyway, I&#8217;d be interested in seeing it. If you can reproduce the problem in a small document can you send it (or perhaps a .inx version of it) to <a href="javascript:degrease('GIDDCFHjDrGoGGCqkqCA',14)">support@pdsassoc.com</a> please.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Traynor</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Traynor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Thanks David and Dave, this works pretty neat! I did find one instance where it didn't seem to work: when the prefs are set to section numbering instead of absolute numbering and you select a page that's not the start of a section, the prefix still appears. I don't think this is an issue as my pages exported to PDF without problems. 

Again, thanks for the handy script (and the zippy resonse!)

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David and Dave, this works pretty neat! I did find one instance where it didn&#8217;t seem to work: when the prefs are set to section numbering instead of absolute numbering and you select a page that&#8217;s not the start of a section, the prefix still appears. I don&#8217;t think this is an issue as my pages exported to PDF without problems. </p>
<p>Again, thanks for the handy script (and the zippy resonse!)</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Saunders</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/get-rid-of-that-absurd-section-prefix.php#comment-212</guid>
		<description>It you look up "bracers" in the dictionary, you won't find this Hampshire-English mangling of "braces" -- which, according to the on-line dictionaries is British for "suspenders." If you pursue that, you'll find that "suspender" is British for "garter." So no wonder I stuck with my Hampshire roots and spell the word the way we used to say it as kids: "bracers"!

All of which brings to mind the Morecambe and Wise skit that started "I say, I say, I say, why does Mr. Kruschev wear red, white and blue braces?"

But I digress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It you look up &#8220;bracers&#8221; in the dictionary, you won&#8217;t find this Hampshire-English mangling of &#8220;braces&#8221; &#8212; which, according to the on-line dictionaries is British for &#8220;suspenders.&#8221; If you pursue that, you&#8217;ll find that &#8220;suspender&#8221; is British for &#8220;garter.&#8221; So no wonder I stuck with my Hampshire roots and spell the word the way we used to say it as kids: &#8220;bracers&#8221;!</p>
<p>All of which brings to mind the Morecambe and Wise skit that started &#8220;I say, I say, I say, why does Mr. Kruschev wear red, white and blue braces?&#8221;</p>
<p>But I digress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
