<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Add a .75 pt Stroke Preset</title>
	<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php</link>
	<description>InDesignSecrets Blog and Podcast</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-356739</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-356739</guid>
					<description>I still don't really understand why an object style isnt want you want here. If you set-up an object style and use quick apply, does that make it happen quick and easy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t really understand why an object style isnt want you want here. If you set-up an object style and use quick apply, does that make it happen quick and easy?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Al Ferrari</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-353540</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-353540</guid>
					<description>How about just having a .75 point rule on the master page and using the eyedropper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about just having a .75 point rule on the master page and using the eyedropper?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-353242</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-353242</guid>
					<description>John I do a lot of works with tables where different strokes are needed at different weights.

I would use CTRL ALT for .75 pt line widths and use the addition of 8,4,6,2 for the different sides (as seen on the number pad).

Similarly I would use CTRL ALT SHIFT plus the numbers to apply the appropriate cell side.

You could use 7, 9, 1, 3 for top left, bottom left, bottom right.

And 5 could be for all sides.

It works surprisingly well, and the number pad is a great visual for when working with cell styles and the sides of cells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John I do a lot of works with tables where different strokes are needed at different weights.</p>
<p>I would use CTRL ALT for .75 pt line widths and use the addition of 8,4,6,2 for the different sides (as seen on the number pad).</p>
<p>Similarly I would use CTRL ALT SHIFT plus the numbers to apply the appropriate cell side.</p>
<p>You could use 7, 9, 1, 3 for top left, bottom left, bottom right.</p>
<p>And 5 could be for all sides.</p>
<p>It works surprisingly well, and the number pad is a great visual for when working with cell styles and the sides of cells.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352533</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352533</guid>
					<description>cell styles might work. I have some cells that need JUST the bottom line 1.5, the rest .75. Then others that have just the right edge 1.5. It depends. I'd have to make a zillion presets and it would end up being just a big a mess. That Quark trick is what I had in mind, I read that years ago. That's the kind of thing I thought might be around in ID. Why ID skips the .75 and others when clicking makes no sense to me either. Those little nags add up on a 400 page document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cell styles might work. I have some cells that need JUST the bottom line 1.5, the rest .75. Then others that have just the right edge 1.5. It depends. I&#8217;d have to make a zillion presets and it would end up being just a big a mess. That Quark trick is what I had in mind, I read that years ago. That&#8217;s the kind of thing I thought might be around in ID. Why ID skips the .75 and others when clicking makes no sense to me either. Those little nags add up on a 400 page document.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anne-Marie</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352506</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352506</guid>
					<description>If you're using these exclusively in tables, John, wouldn't it be faster to just create a cell style you could apply to full rows or columns that uses the 1.5 (or .75 rule, or both -- one for vertical and the other for horizontal) as necessary? 

Like a character style, with cell styles you don't have to specify anything else, just the stroke width.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re using these exclusively in tables, John, wouldn&#8217;t it be faster to just create a cell style you could apply to full rows or columns that uses the 1.5 (or .75 rule, or both &#8212; one for vertical and the other for horizontal) as necessary? </p>
<p>Like a character style, with cell styles you don&#8217;t have to specify anything else, just the stroke width.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: low Jackson</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352235</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352235</guid>
					<description>Peter, you can find &#38; replace an INX file - but since john needs to apply 2 different styles it would make searching more awkward, I'm sure you could find some pattern to search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, you can find &amp; replace an INX file - but since john needs to apply 2 different styles it would make searching more awkward, I&#8217;m sure you could find some pattern to search.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Kemp</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352193</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352193</guid>
					<description>Back in the old Quark days, there was a trick where you had to go into the actual Quark code and add whatever line weights you wanted and they showed in the line dialog. It's been too long ago for me to remember the process but maybe someone does and I wonder if a similar process might work in ID. 

Close to the same subject, why, when you click on the down arrow to change the line weight, does ID jump from 1 point to 0 point, skipping .5 and .25?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the old Quark days, there was a trick where you had to go into the actual Quark code and add whatever line weights you wanted and they showed in the line dialog. It&#8217;s been too long ago for me to remember the process but maybe someone does and I wonder if a similar process might work in ID. </p>
<p>Close to the same subject, why, when you click on the down arrow to change the line weight, does ID jump from 1 point to 0 point, skipping .5 and .25?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: low Jackson</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352053</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-352053</guid>
					<description>I'd give in and do it with styles, but adding a keyboard shortcut(s) to apply them quicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d give in and do it with styles, but adding a keyboard shortcut(s) to apply them quicker.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Klaus Nordby</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-351528</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-351528</guid>
					<description>OK, I've not submitted any lunatic ideas lately, so it's about time. Produce &lt;em&gt;everything&lt;/em&gt; in your document 200% larger than the final printed size. Then you'll have access to the 3pt stroke preset which will make for a fine 1.5pt stroke at 50% output.  

Well, at least I win today's Originality Prize, right? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ve not submitted any lunatic ideas lately, so it&#8217;s about time. Produce <em>everything</em> in your document 200% larger than the final printed size. Then you&#8217;ll have access to the 3pt stroke preset which will make for a fine 1.5pt stroke at 50% output.  </p>
<p>Well, at least I win today&#8217;s Originality Prize, right? <img src='http://indesignsecrets.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Blatner</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-351520</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-add-a-75-pt-stroke-preset.php#comment-351520</guid>
					<description>Brian: Oh! Yes, that makes sense. Thanks for that. Don't know where my brain was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian: Oh! Yes, that makes sense. Thanks for that. Don&#8217;t know where my brain was.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
