January 10 2010 • 10:17 AM

InDesignSecrets Podcast 117


Listen in your browser:
InDesignSecrets-117.mp3
(15 MB, 29:48 minutes)

Get the Flash Player to see the wordTube Media Player.
The transcript of this podcast will be posted soon.

5 Responses discussing this post. Add yours below.

  1. Jim Jordan
    January 11th, 2010 • 5:42 pm • Link

    I heard Diane Burns mention she prefers Mac over Windows because she observed more folks on the Windows side having issues with type than those on the Mac side. Doesn’t InDesign use its own type rendering (not OS-dependent) so platform should make no difference?

  2. January 11th, 2010 • 5:49 pm • Link

    @Jim: Well, I certainly don’t want to get in a platform war here. I don’t think it’s just type, though. And I think she was commenting on Asian languages in particular. In that case, no, it’s not just InDesign. There are input method issues that are different, I believe.

  3. Kriss Laber
    January 12th, 2010 • 5:10 am • Link

    I find Diane so interesting to listen to. I enjoyed this interview and the tables webinar. Thank you.

  4. Jim Jordan
    January 12th, 2010 • 9:13 am • Link

    @ David

    The Asian language staff I work with are using Windows and I have not heard complaints from them so I was wondering how a Mac would do better in that regard.

    I’m no fan of platform wars either, which is why I found her observation unusual that any particular platform worked better for her language applicati0n. For the past decade, it has been a pretty even competition. I cannot imagine that the Eastern World would use a greater ratio of Mac:Windows than the Western World because Mac makes Asian languages any easier to manage.

  5. January 12th, 2010 • 3:20 pm • Link

    @Jim: Thanks for your post, which gives me the opportunity to clarify the platform point. I did say, but should have probably emphasized, that one platform isn’t really better than the other for multilingual publishing.

    When I made the comment about font handling, I was thinking of font encoding, unrelated to font rendering. Especially for older Type 1 and TrueType fonts, and especially for Chinese, Simplified and Traditional font encoding can get wormy. E.g., some font might only have Simplified characters, some just Traditional, etc. some fonts have both.

    I was also thinking of the question for users who are in the U.S. or Europe, for whom Asian language publishing can be quite daunting. After all, the standard Japanese font has 20,000 characters! And to be honest, my comment on font handling issues is only from my impression of posts I’ve seen on Adobe Forums; when users have problems with Asian text and fonts, it’s often on Windows, though this could be simply because more Asian publishing is being done on Windows. And you are right, Windows has by far the larger market share in Asia, and especially in China.

    And David touched on another point: Windows XP required an extra install to get the input system and related fonts for Asian text. I assume this is not an issue with more recent versions, especially Windows 7, but it could, I suppose, affect those working with legacy documents or workgroups using older Windows systems.

    Anyway, the bottom line is if you’re working with Asian staff on Windows, please don’t feel you’re missing anything. After all, I gave my disclaimer in the podcast–I’m definitely biased in favor of Macintosh, but happy to live in a cross-platform world!

Subscribe to the Discussion

Get the ongoing discussion surrounding "InDesignSecrets Podcast 117" delivered to you. Click here to subscribe via RSS.

Leave a Reply

You can use limited HTML tags, such as <em></em> for emphasis/italics and <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

InDesignSecrets reserves the right to edit and/or remove posts and comments.