<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Utilizing Alpha Channels When Placing Extracted Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php</link>
	<description>InDesignSecrets Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan G</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-471640</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-471640</guid>
		<description>I mostly avoid the Magic Wand because of its &quot;all or nothing&quot; approach to selecting pixels. In this case Select&gt;Color Range would work very well (it allows for partial selections, which preserves anti-aliasing in the image), and the selection dialog is interactive so you can see what you&#039;re getting. 

But for me the fast approach to a complex image like this is usually to duplicate the highest-contrast  channel in the channels palette, reverse it, and then make a quick Levels adjustment.  Problems with jpeg compression or variations of background shade or texture become very easy to see and control, and the alpha channel is easy to fine tune with the dodge and burn tools. (Set Dodge to &quot;Highlights&quot; and Burn to &quot;Shadows&quot; with a 25-50% exposure setting.)

Katrin Eisman&#039;s excellent and thorough &quot;Photoshop Masking and Compositing&quot; is a terrific resource for this sort of thing.

Another point worth making is that InDesign handles an alpha channel in a PSD &lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; more accurately than the same channel in a TIFF. I&#039;ve never bothered to find out why; I just always use PSD for placed images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly avoid the Magic Wand because of its &#8220;all or nothing&#8221; approach to selecting pixels. In this case Select&gt;Color Range would work very well (it allows for partial selections, which preserves anti-aliasing in the image), and the selection dialog is interactive so you can see what you&#8217;re getting. </p>
<p>But for me the fast approach to a complex image like this is usually to duplicate the highest-contrast  channel in the channels palette, reverse it, and then make a quick Levels adjustment.  Problems with jpeg compression or variations of background shade or texture become very easy to see and control, and the alpha channel is easy to fine tune with the dodge and burn tools. (Set Dodge to &#8220;Highlights&#8221; and Burn to &#8220;Shadows&#8221; with a 25-50% exposure setting.)</p>
<p>Katrin Eisman&#8217;s excellent and thorough &#8220;Photoshop Masking and Compositing&#8221; is a terrific resource for this sort of thing.</p>
<p>Another point worth making is that InDesign handles an alpha channel in a PSD <em>much</em> more accurately than the same channel in a TIFF. I&#8217;ve never bothered to find out why; I just always use PSD for placed images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blatner</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-470542</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blatner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-470542</guid>
		<description>Just to back up Ted here: Absolutely! Using alpha transparency in imported images is one of the best reasons to use InDesign. 

You can also sort of &lt;a href=&quot;http://indesignsecrets.com/turn-any-object-into-a-transparency-mask.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;make your own transparency masks&lt;/a&gt; in InDesign with any object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to back up Ted here: Absolutely! Using alpha transparency in imported images is one of the best reasons to use InDesign. </p>
<p>You can also sort of <a href="http://indesignsecrets.com/turn-any-object-into-a-transparency-mask.php" rel="nofollow">make your own transparency masks</a> in InDesign with any object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted LoCascio</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-470534</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted LoCascio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-470534</guid>
		<description>@Lee - Yes, you really can use transparency through alpha channels in InDesign. I&#039;ve never had a problem. It is not a solid path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lee &#8211; Yes, you really can use transparency through alpha channels in InDesign. I&#8217;ve never had a problem. It is not a solid path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-470492</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-470492</guid>
		<description>Let’s just get one thing straight: you can’t really use alpha channels in InDesign, can you?

I mean it will make a solid path based on the 50% threshold of the channel, but you can’t actually use the transparency?

When I moved over to InDesign from Quark, alpha channels was one of the things I was looking forward to using. But after trying many times, I could never get them to work. The only alpha channel support seems to be just a cheap way of getting a clipping path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let’s just get one thing straight: you can’t really use alpha channels in InDesign, can you?</p>
<p>I mean it will make a solid path based on the 50% threshold of the channel, but you can’t actually use the transparency?</p>
<p>When I moved over to InDesign from Quark, alpha channels was one of the things I was looking forward to using. But after trying many times, I could never get them to work. The only alpha channel support seems to be just a cheap way of getting a clipping path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-470434</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-470434</guid>
		<description>Ah, Klaus you&#039;ve triggered a memory. Indeed, you are correct. It was at the time of sending EPS from Quark through a RIP. Argh, obviously blocked out that memory :)  Ok, I have bad memories of Alpha Channels through RIPs.

Ok, I&#039;m convinced, Ted this is a fantastic post and I&#039;m convinced. In the back of my mind I always kept thinking, &quot;NO TO ALPHA CHANNELS&quot; but now, as Klaus points out, in PDF they pose no &quot;threat&quot;&quot;.

Great stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Klaus you&#8217;ve triggered a memory. Indeed, you are correct. It was at the time of sending EPS from Quark through a RIP. Argh, obviously blocked out that memory <img src='http://indesignsecrets.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Ok, I have bad memories of Alpha Channels through RIPs.</p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;m convinced, Ted this is a fantastic post and I&#8217;m convinced. In the back of my mind I always kept thinking, &#8220;NO TO ALPHA CHANNELS&#8221; but now, as Klaus points out, in PDF they pose no &#8220;threat&#8221;".</p>
<p>Great stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaus Nordby</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-470431</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus Nordby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-470431</guid>
		<description>@Eugene: &quot;The reason I am not convinced is that some RIPs I’ve dealt with don&#039;t handle Alpha Channels very well, or not at all.&quot; If one prints directly from ID to the RIP, that could be an issue -- but surely, if one creates a PDF from ID, either flattened or with live transparency, then all those alpha channels should become harmless in the PDF, and hence not a danger to ill-behaving RIPs? Can anyone confirm or deny this theory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eugene: &#8220;The reason I am not convinced is that some RIPs I’ve dealt with don&#8217;t handle Alpha Channels very well, or not at all.&#8221; If one prints directly from ID to the RIP, that could be an issue &#8212; but surely, if one creates a PDF from ID, either flattened or with live transparency, then all those alpha channels should become harmless in the PDF, and hence not a danger to ill-behaving RIPs? Can anyone confirm or deny this theory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-470430</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-470430</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not entirely convinced of this. Although it&#039;s an interesting approach to removing a background. The reason I am not convinced is that some RIPs I&#039;ve dealt with don&#039;t handle Alpha Channels very well, or not at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not entirely convinced of this. Although it&#8217;s an interesting approach to removing a background. The reason I am not convinced is that some RIPs I&#8217;ve dealt with don&#8217;t handle Alpha Channels very well, or not at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby Fairchild</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-470429</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby Fairchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-470429</guid>
		<description>I agree with Ted.  In addition to what Ted said regarding alpha channels being applicable to the whole image rather than just a layer as with layer masks, you can use a layer mask (or selection) to then create an alpha channel to be stored with the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ted.  In addition to what Ted said regarding alpha channels being applicable to the whole image rather than just a layer as with layer masks, you can use a layer mask (or selection) to then create an alpha channel to be stored with the image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted LoCascio</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-470417</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted LoCascio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-470417</guid>
		<description>An alpha channel is a mask that is applied to the entire image (all layers) rather than a single layer. You can only apply one layer mask to a single layer, but you can create multiple alpha channels. For example, I could create another alpha channel based on a selection of the flower without the stem.

You can create as many alpha channels as you want, store them in the image, and then apply them in InDesign. Layer masks are non-destructive and I use them all the time, but you can&#039;t control them in InDesign like you can with alpha channels.

I think creating a selection and using Refine Edge is much easier than working with Calculations. The latter is a legacy feature which is far less intuitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An alpha channel is a mask that is applied to the entire image (all layers) rather than a single layer. You can only apply one layer mask to a single layer, but you can create multiple alpha channels. For example, I could create another alpha channel based on a selection of the flower without the stem.</p>
<p>You can create as many alpha channels as you want, store them in the image, and then apply them in InDesign. Layer masks are non-destructive and I use them all the time, but you can&#8217;t control them in InDesign like you can with alpha channels.</p>
<p>I think creating a selection and using Refine Edge is much easier than working with Calculations. The latter is a legacy feature which is far less intuitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Gantner</title>
		<link>http://indesignsecrets.com/utilizing-alpha-channels-when-placing-extracted-images.php/comment-page-1#comment-470415</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Gantner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indesignsecrets.com/?p=2203#comment-470415</guid>
		<description>With that image one of the fastest ways to get a nice outlined images appears to be the calculations command. Use it to create an alpha channel that  is &quot;grey&quot; multiplied into &quot;grey&quot;, or try some other combinations. A little refining and you should be able to come up with a good greyscale mask which can be turned into a layer mask for the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With that image one of the fastest ways to get a nice outlined images appears to be the calculations command. Use it to create an alpha channel that  is &#8220;grey&#8221; multiplied into &#8220;grey&#8221;, or try some other combinations. A little refining and you should be able to come up with a good greyscale mask which can be turned into a layer mask for the image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: indesignsecrets.com @ 2012-05-25 01:06:45 -->
